Good question, if you know nothing about Hillary's cerulean canine
roots. But one fact that remains glaringly obvious to those of us paying
attention to these things and those Hillary supporters who are just as
strenuously ignoring those pesky facts is Hillary officially hired
Monsanto fuck stick Jerry Crawford to manage her presidential campaign.
Of course, the so-called liberals who back Hillary can be excused for
not knowing their facts about their girl since the MSM is largely
worthless in bringing up those inconvenient facts, as evidenced in this breezy puff piece
in the WaPo's Style section. Yeah, I know Style pieces in any paper are
supposed to be ultimately worthless, breezy eye candy. Yet, since it
contained hard political data (such as Crawford failing to deliver even a
place much less a win for Hillary in Iowa in 2008), you'd think
Monsanto's good name would've merited at least a fleeting mention.
And to anyone who pays even a scintilla of attention to anything
Clinton says, it's screamingly obvious this woman has been pimping for
Monsanto to the point of practically gargling Roundup after sucking
various cock at the Biotech Industry Conference in San Diego last year.
How anyone, especially a self-styled Democrat, can publicly and
frequently advocate for Genetically Modified Organisms is beyond me
except when one considers benefits of such a whoring for an evil empire
such as Monsanto (even when her campaign manager no longer works for
Crawford's track record: He's long been considered a kingmaker for
Democrats in his native Iowa, especially those who are friendly to
Monsanto (which alone ought to show you of the alarming number of supine
so-called Democrats that Crawford's helped over the years). But even
when it meant costing a "fellow" Democrat a job, Crawford supported the Republican
running against him and, well, just keep reading.
Jerry Crawford also played a big hand in
the 2010 Agriculture Secretary election, which was an election that
showed Monsanto does not care about a person’s party allegiance as long
as said person doesn’t oppose them. The reason why is because the
election’s Democratic nominee Francis Thicke was a critic of Monsanto.
Ergo, Monsanto showed major support for the Republican nominee Bill
Northey. Crawford would then endorse Northey, touting his backing as
evidence of “strong bipartisan support.” Crawford even said he was a
“veteran Democratic political insider” to help push Northey. As a
result, Northey won the election with a landslide 67 percent of the
That kind of Tonya Harding-style kneecapping verges on Karl Rove
territory yet the WaPo would have us believe Jerry boy's a simple ole
Midwestern lawyer with a love for fast horses and slow candidates.
I had Hillary pegged eight years ago when she ran a campaign that was,
predictably, more rotten with lobbyists than even John McCain's (which
is saying something). But you'd have to be a complete fucking idiot on a
par with a Trump supporter to be duped by Hillary's easy populism about
taking on the 1% of which she's a part and from whom she's vacuuming up
enormous amounts of bribe money to spout their lines.
tell me again about how Bernie's not electable, at how he's not viable.
But one fact remains clear: When Bernie veers into populist rhetoric,
his populism is merely incidental because he means what he says.
Oh, by voting for Bernie in the primary I'd be "splitting the
party?" Perhaps. If that's what I'd be doing, then that's because this
Crawford learned that trick from another Crawford.